Tag Archives: newt gingrich

About Ron Paul and liberalism

liberalismMany of the mass media operatives and anti-American propagandists are once more desperately trying to bring Ron Paul back into the public debate and the media eye, somehow by alleging him as the new liberal “revolution” and anti-establishment candidate.

Passing on the fact that he is as anti-establishment as Arthur Ruppin was anti-Zionist and that most of his proposals are just rehearsals of previous internationalist and globalist political beliefs coupled with even more ethnomasochism, there is at least some truth to the media propaganda for once : Ron Paul is liberal. Liberal as in real liberal, not left-wing progressive. I intentionally avoid the label classical liberal.

Now if the media for once got their facts right, they are of course completely wrong in their analysis of these facts.

Many representatives will say that Ron Paul popularized, or re-popularized, liberalism. Some will even go so far as to say that Ron Paul is popular because of his liberal views.

But I assure you, if Ron Paul manages to combine popularity in the globalist media and liberal views, there is no causality involved at all. I would go so far as to say that not only Ron Paul is not popular because of his liberal views, but rather popular despite his liberal inclinations.

Notice that those that support Ron Paul, that is to say every internationalist media to an extend, doesn’t do so because Ron Paul opposes public spending, governmental regulations and Keynesianism, but rather because he is seen as an objector to what they call “American imperialism”.

Ron Paul isn’t that much more economically liberal than Newt Gingrich or Ronald Reagan, but the reason he gets support from the anti-American media is simply because he has a very globalist and demagogic message : peace.

Furthermore, Ron Paul also has support for opposing the government, which is the new scapegoat of 2012. And by opposing I mean deluding himself and blaming everything on. But what he forgets is that liberalism isn’t particularly anti-government at all.

Liberalism doesn’t have to mean a limited government, rather an efficient government.

The media are dead wrong to believe that liberalism has rejuvenated. Liberalism means individual responsibility, and ethnomasochism is far from individual responsibility.
The more the American people strive for globalism, foreignism and anti-Americanism, the more they will be drawn to socialism regardless. If liberalism is a little more popular now than it used to be, it’s simply the result of the Bush/Obama fiasco.

But don’t delude yourself into believing that liberalism is back on the political agenda and that the United States citizens will suddenly change their political and ideological views. Nowadays Americans, if we can even call them Americans, are far too attached to the socialist values that gave birth to internationalism and ethnomasochism in the first place : collective irresponsibility, group think and sheep mentality.

Advertisements

The 2012 Demagogic elections

About every four years a very particular and intriguing event is held somewhere in the United States of America Demagogy, and many signs show that this year’s event will be at least as lame as every other year.

Similarly to how other countries elect representatives to govern them and act in their best interest, we in the United States of America Demagogy elect notorious globalists and demagogues to govern us, and act against our national interest.

You would be thinking that with the economic crisis that touches our country more then any other, with nationalist movements rising more than ever in Europe and every other country, with the disastrous results of half a decade of ethnomasochism and globalism, Americans would start to wake up and demand that their government start working in the national interest.

But apparently Americans are more concerned with gay rights, birth control pills and the legalization of marijuana.

These same Americans don’t seem to notice that they will soon experience a very painful blowback to use Ron Paul’s favorite term, once the Fed stops printing money. The errors of half a decade of ethnomasochistic governing and foreignism won’t be repaired with yet another bailout, and the consequences that Americans are starting to see are only the tip of the iceberg.

It was pretty funny last year to watch the Occupy Wall Street movement, yet another blatant excuse for anti-Americanism promoted by our ethnomasochistic media, because of the wide ignorance of the protesters.

Not only were they proposing even more international socialism to resolve problems created by international socialism, but really if they think our economic situation now is difficult, wait and see how it will be when the Europeans or the Russian take us over.

And no, there won’t be a massive bailout to magically solve our decades of trade-deficit, debt accumulation and other consequences to our anti-American globalist actions.

Even Ron Paul’s policies to cut government spending are widely insufficient at best, on the wrong track at worst.
As much as we need government spending’s limited, that alone won’t solve most of our problems. Germany, China, India, Denmark, France, Sweden Russia and most of the globe all have economies that are a lot more government depended than us (59% of GDP for Denmark, 56% for France) and their economy is in better shape than ours.

In 2008, we had to choose between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea, but trust me in 2012 we will have both.

As long as American interests aren’t the top and only priority of the voters, you might as well keep Obama and his current administration because no candidate is projecting much change in our ideology.

And apparently, seeing the possible candidates for the 2012 elections, the public opinion hasn’t evolved one bit despite the economic crisis of 2012.

As for me, once again I will not vote for anyone.

I was considered voting Ron Paul earlier this year but seriously it’s not even worth the effort, and I wouldn’t want to encourage the globalist system with my vote.

As long as we won’t have American elections, based on American interests and not demagogy, voting will be as useless here as in central Africa.

Taxonomy of the anti-Americans and other ethnomasochists

As you all know unless you are either totally new or totally oblivious to American politics, we are governed by the anti-Americans.
Whether they take the aspect of the change obsessed pathological liar (Barack Obama), the idealist civil war veteran (Ron Paul), the openly indoctrinated foreign loving trying-to-sound-ecological lobbyists (Green Party), the frustrated virgin racial internationalists (American Nazi Party, Ku Klux Klan), the constructivist religious fanatics (Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich) or even the openly international anti-American socialists, they all have one point in common : they hate American sovereignty.

They are always trying to ally their respective community/views/lobbies to fit the international and anti-American doctrine, in an attempt to weaken even more our nation.

And there are also the less visible governors, those that pledge allegiance to Europe and global imperialism, those that secretly support directly from the congress every lobby possible that favors Europe and the Foreign over the American interests, while claiming it’s in the interest of our nation.

But those are the cases of a very reserved part of the American population. Not everyone can improvise themselves governors of our nation without a certain social status, acquired by feeding even more of American sovereignty to the global imperialism and their private, or not so private, interests.
The following categories are, as we shall see, much less reserved and almost anyone can join them, provided they rid themselves of any form or ability of reflection, or at least steer it down the path of least resistance. A wide and comfortable furrow marked and trailed by decades of disinformation and ethnomasochism.

Different species of anti-Americans

Far ahead of any other species by its numerous quantity and low intellectual quotient is the hippie.
The hippie is what modern (and anti-American) media may refer to as a “liberal”. Resulting from the social-globalist culture, therefore being deprived on any depth of thought, the hippie is against war because it’s bad, and supports peace because it’s good.

He enjoys anything that is foreign because seen as “exotic”, he appreciates foreign films because he believes bad acting and poor screenplay are better forms of self-expression than constructed and methodical cinematic approaches that actually require some effort.
He is against Americanization of society, the 1%, the banks, the rednecks, the government, Wall Street and Fox News because NBC told him that it would get him pussy (and also because he doesn’t want to be labelled as “racist”).
He is open to any form of governmental regulation, socialism, Marxism, communism and even fascism (without him knowing the proper meaning of the term of course) as long as it doesn’t involve anything patriotic, because patriotism is bad and it leads to far-right ideologies like Hitler, Mussolini, Staline and Obama.
Alternatively, he can also be pro-liberty, pro-choice and anti-regulation depending on which politician got to influence him first.

Assuming the crappy mindset of “another world is possible” and that Foreign interests are more important than American interests because he is against racial and national discrimination. He is for the love of all mankind, and will often employ terms such as “citizens of the world”, “the human race”, “global interest”… Despite visiting foreign countries for tourism (ethnomasochism once more), he usually can’t even speak half a language and has no clue how economical or social interactions work, and is comforted in his fictional ideals by the lies and propaganda of the feel-good anti-American media. Generally, with these people the discussion is impossible as they often lack the basics understandings, the intelligence, the maturity or even the perspective to comprehend or even try to acknowledge the issues.

The second class of anti-American population that we would examine is the indoctrinator. Having secured a minor degree in political science, or simply just befriending the HR director of a local broadcast channel, the indoctrinator is widely located within media diffusion center, whether newspapers, television or radio.
His beliefs are similar to those of the hippie, only he is characterized by even more confidence in his doctrine because of his empowerment. Valiantly defending free-speech, he would likely censor anything that doesn’t fit exactly the anti-American globalist propaganda.
According to him, the United States caused World Wars I, II and III, global warming, hunger, Katrina, Fukushima, 9/11, the bubonic pest, necrophilia and child prostitution. If you don’t agree with that, you are a racist, fascist, intolerant child abuser and holocaust denier. You have been warned.

Thirdly, there is the wannabe-dissident. A very intriguing class of ethnomasochists popularized by no other than Ron Paul himself, the wannabe-dissent believes that he is challenging the system, or the establishment, while proposing the exact same reforms as the ones already applied for the last fifty years.
For this particular class of anti-Americans, I will go so far as to quote Einstein “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” and inviting you to read my article They all want change, which is partially about the wannabe-dissidents.

And lastly, a very common case of anti-Americanism, the extremist fanatic. Whether about gay rights, feminism, white pride, Islam, Christianity or environment, there are always the extremist fanatics believing that there is a greater good above the national interest, and willing to sacrifice our sovereignty for it.

To all these cases also adds the one of those who act purely in their own interests : Whether they are adepts of the American Business Model (serial importers of foreign products or culture), parasite free-trader, infiltrated foreigners or traitors to their nation : they are the are in the group that’s directly benefiting from the growing ethnomasochism and anti-Americanism in our own country.
They know exactly how the anti-American machine works, and how to feed it properly to ensure their economic prosperity (and our economic decline). It’s not that hard if you read this article by the way.

Dichotomy of the anti-Americanism

This taxonomy list is far from being complete, but it gives a general idea of who the ethnomasochists are. It has another utility for the patriot, which is to definite two main constants in anti-Americanism.
Those who promote anti-Americanism, ethnomasochism or any other derived form that profits the foreign interest are either hypocritical or cynical.

The hypocrites will used terms as “global interests” and “citizens of the world” to convince Americans to adopt ethnomasochism. They are comparable to Jehovah witnesses, and strive to the destruction of American sovereignty.
The cynics on the other hand, acknowledge that they are working against our interest but also know that if they don’t do it, someone else will… and someone else will profit from it.

Review of Ron Paul’s message

As much as I am supportive of most of Ron Paul’s economic projects, including the public debt reduction and the non interventionism of the State.
Now the grass isn’t all green in my opinion as a few points are making me doubt and express serious reserves about the benefits of having this candidate in the White House.

Lets take this video for example as it illustrates particularly well what I mean.

Why Ron Paul shouldn’t be president

“A man led by principles”

Unfortunately, this illustrates much to well the actual mindset of most politicians.
In our country that lacks ethnocentrism like no other, Ron Paul reinforced this non-partisanship by his messages based on “principles”, “what is right to do” and so on.

“voted against every tax”

It is clearly a form/substance debate here, but I am particularly opposed to the way he spreads the libertarian/liberal message.
It seems here that the only reason he is supporting liberalism is because it is against taxes and individual liberties. Yet another non-ethnocentric way of presenting it.
The correct way for a patriot to present the liberal ideas would be “It would be beneficial for the USA to […]”.

You see the difference ? By not being ethnocentric, like any politician should be (and is in other countries), he is reinforcing the ethno-masochism sentiment we currently live in.
Part of liberalism is individual responsibility (as opposed to collective irresponsibility promoted by socialism), eluding the facts of ethno-masochism is not part of making American people more responsible and more patriotic.
As such, I don’t even consider Ron Paul as a liberal. For me he is just a variation of the traditional socialists and anti-American that populate our political institutions.

A lot of his ideas are good, but not for the right reasons.

Why do you think that a lot of countries, for most enemies of the USA, are supporting Ron Paul ? If Ron Paul was really the “one” candidate that could revitalize our economy, why are the foreigners supporting him ?
1. They like USA and wish the best for us ? Hippie approach, highly improbable (except for Kosovo maybe). Most of the foreign media now promoting Ron Paul are the same that promote nationalism and anti-American in their own countries.
2. They want discounts in Calvin Klein fragrances ? Most of these countries have already showed that they are excellent in plagiarizing American products.
3. They want to serve their best interests and know what is beneficial for them ? Almost there.
4. They want America to continue so far down the ethno-masochist path that they wont be able to get back up ? Point.

The same medias that supported anti-Americans throughout the world, that even supported the OWS fallacy, are now promoting Ron Paul’s viewpoints in OUR country ?
And they want us to believe its in OUR interest ?

There is a common saying, “Whoever is feared the most by your enemies is a good ally”.
Just read or watch what the French/German/Belgians were saying when Reagan (a pro-American AND liberal) was elected. They were diabolism him by all means, portraying him as a fascist anti-European nationalist and totalitarian, while their own politics were a hundred times more nationalists and chauvinist than Reagan’s would ever be.

Now we have Italian and Indian dudes supporting Ron Paul. There is clearly a difference in the public opinion overseas. Did all these countries that hated us, supported anti-American organization and politicians, and spread lies in their media suddenly change their views on our country ? Or did they just see an opportunity to reinforce the ethno-mascochist in America ?
I’m not trying to sound as if I base my judgement purely on overseas public opinions, it’s obviously not the case but it serves as a perfect illustration of my point.

I do believe that the future of the USA will be, and must be, of liberalism. But clearly Ron Paul is not the best solution, despite the fact that I like most of his propositions.
On the other side of Ron Paul we have Gingrich, who is patriotic, but tends to be too much Keynesian/Statist for my taste.

The approach of a liberal candidate, or any candidate, should not be some sort of idealist quest to please the masses. As I said, if you want to promote freedom for the sake of freedom, or peace for the sake of peace, nothing stops you from joining Greenpeace or any other charity organization. But please don’t pretend your are trying to help America by doing so, the only things that can help America are NATIONALISM and PATRIOTISM.

The same remark goes to the religion fanatics (Santorum) and other Bachmann/Palin and all the others. If your concern is not the sovereignty and power of the USA, gtfo of politics and join some random organization, you will probably help your country more by doing so that by monopolizing the White House for 4 years.

In conclusion : Ron Paul, good ideas but not for the good reasons.