Tag Archives: American

Why vote for the American Nationalist Party ?

Many American citizens want a real change from the Republican and Democrat parties who offer the same solutions to the very problems they helped create. But a lot of these Americans don’t consider supporting the American Nationalist Party ( http://www.nationsiege.com ) because they see it as either “racist”, “fascist” or “intolerant”.

American Nationalism

American Nationalism as portrayed by the media

Nothing is further from the truth, and if American Nationalism has a reputation of being an “intolerant movement” it owes it more to the left wing media propaganda than to the actual program of the party.

American Nationalism is first and foremost about protecting our sovereignty and national identity. The American nationalist refuses the totalitarian diktat of the United Nations, the World Trade Organization and the European Union.

Essentially, American nationalism is about doing what is right for our country in all circumstances and independently of our differences and political ideologies.

To read more about the American nationalist platform http://www.nationsiege.com/nationalist-party

Advertisements

How will the USA pay for its trade deficit ?

trade deficitAmong the 2012 presidential debates that spread quickly and increasingly over this country, quite a few yet not as much as expected concern the economic situation of the United States of America.
Strangely enough, these same economic debates will have been characterized by two essentials elements : the overly pronounced taste for globalism of our candidates and the complete absence of solutions concerning the trade deficit.

For the first one, no real surprise you don’t step out of five decades of blatant ethnomasochism as easily. For the second characteristic on the other hand, even though I half expected it I must say I am nevertheless taken aback by the stupid of those who desire to govern us.

On the economic table,you might have witnessed a few lonely tirades about the public spending, and even less numerous interventions about the unemployment, which Ron Paul blames on the… FED. How original.

I truly have a hard time seeing how monetary creation, if that’s what Ron Paul reproaches to the FED in the first place, leads to unemployment since on the contrary, in the short term monetary creation will bring devaluation of the currency, and lead to more exports. It’s only in the long term that monetary creation can show its perverse effects, more on that later.

But aside from Ron Paul’s usual ramble, very few mentions to our current economic situation have been noticeable, like for example our record high trade deficit. It’s also funny to notice that we barely use the term “trade balance” anymore, only “trade deficit” implying that our balance couldn’t be positive.

Only once again, and if you dispose of whatever political experience or plainly common sense you may already have noticed, purposely ignoring an issue won’t make it fix itself. We’ve had proof for the public debt, the ethnomasochism, the anti-Americanism and countless other political experiments.

The truth about the trade deficit in America

Every candidate talks openly about such concepts as wealth redistribution and common wealth, but what they seemingly fail to notice is that to have any wealth to distribute you have to produce it first. And as we fail to produce any wealth, actually we lose some each day hence the term trade deficit, our economic system is only feeding on a smaller and smaller piece of cake : our past gains.

The only companies actually bringing money into the USA are the very old ones, often times the ones labelled as corporations by the mass media, and they are also believe or not the most taxed entities in this country.

But taxing our big companies is not and was never enough for our economic system not to collapse under the weight of the drag that is our American Business Model.

To substitute to our nonexistent and even hugely deficient production of wealth, there are three solutions.
1. Tax money
2. Print money
3. Borrow money

Needless to say that our government is applying all three of these, and rather ineffectively.

But don’t forget that Americans are sheep, and whole common wealth system is designed against them. In the long run that is.

The system is designed by essence for the supply to meet the demand by all needs necessary, disregarding our sovereignty and our long term national interests (the liberals always talk about collective interest, but what is more collective than our own nation I demand).

Americans are such sheep that as long as the supply meets the demand, or in this case the demands, they won’t protest. They all want the “miracle pill” to solve all our problems, and that’s exactly why charlatans such as Ron Paul can rise effortlessly on top of all political polls.
Americans aren’t lucid at all when it comes to political and economical decisions, and these democratic debates often turn out to be one way overbidding schemes.

– We aren’t producing enough wealth and bringing enough money in our country ? We can either change our ways and adopt a more patriotic form of citizenship, or we can just tax the rich and the companies. The latter solution is easier, more demagogic and by the time the consequences will arise there will be a new president in the office to put the blame on.

– We can’t tax the rich anymore but still aren’t bringing enough money in our country ? We can either change our ways and adopt a more patriotic form of citizenship, or we can just borrow our money with massive interest rates from other countries, most of which openly consider themselves our enemies. The latter solution is easier, more demagogic and by the time the consequences will arise there will be a new president in the office to put the blame on.

– We can’t borrow anymore money but still aren’t bringing enough money in our country ? We can either change our ways and adopt a more patriotic form of citizenship, or we can just print more money disregarding the issues linked to devaluation. The latter solution is easier, more demagogic and by the time the consequences will arise there will be a new president in the office to put the blame on.

The candidate Ron Paul and several other conservatives have strongly opposed the concept of monetary creation, at least indirectly, and the “FED system”. Unsurprisingly, none of them has ever brought up the consequences of ending a system on which our whole economy is now dependent.

And for once in the history of the United States of Demagogy, there is a possibility that the supply won’t meet the demand, simply because there is no more supply. There are no more fake issues, “miracle pills”, Jesus-is-our-savior-he-will-fix-our-economy-vote-Santorum-2012, nonviable settlements, wrong answers and non-solutions to disconnect the American people from the market.
Our politicians believed they could just ignore the reality of economic war and the market altogether, but they are only just starting to see the consequences of fifty decades of internationalism and ethnomasochism.

Ron Paul and his foreign support

americans are sheep

Credits for photo : Garry Gay

Surely many Americans are the biggest sheep in the world, and even more surely these same Americans will pay the price for this naivety in a very near future. Unfortunately, many not-so-sheep Americans will also have to pay the same price. That’s the beauty of collective irresponsibility.

I don’t know if you watched Ron Paul’s speech to a Town Hall meeting in Maryland, but it’s very revealing concerning his ambitions as a president.
A very interesting segment was when he said that we should all unite under our love for liberty and forget communities and differences. Replace liberty with equality and you have the exact same speech as Lenin. Anationalism in other words.

It’s funny how the globalists are always demanding for sacrifices in the name of a “greater good”, such as globalism, freedom. But what they won’t tell you and Americans won’t seem to realize is that it’s always the same that are performing these sacrifices (Americans) and the same that are on the receiving end (the foreign).

You don’t see such speeches in the European elections for example. No candidate would dare put a “greater good” above national interests. But Americans don’t seem to notice anything happening outside their borders.

You may see a lot of foreign support for Ron Paul as I previously evoked on this blog, but does that mean they like his ideas ? Or just that they want him in the White House ?

Notice that far from being ashamed of this foreign support, Ron Paul actually praises it on any possible occasion. It seems he accords even more value to foreign support than national support, which says long about a candidate to the United States presidency.

If Americans weren’t so much following the sheep mentality and mindless group-think they’d start to look a little closer at the foreign governments, and start to notice some incoherence.

For example, just look at how much support Ron Paul received from France or Russia. But who are their presidents ? Libertarians or nationalists ? This applies for any other country in the world, India, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic.

Look at the polls, look at their candidates, look at their senates, look at their propositions, look at their political programs ? Do they even have a libertarian candidate ? In most cases no, and if they do it’s far from being the globalist ethnomasochist hippie-fest that Ron Paul promulgates, and a lot closer to nationalism coupled with classical liberalism.

If Americans weren’t such sheep, they’d notice that far from wanting more libertarianism for their countries, they just want Ron Paul elected as president of the United States.

But unfortunately, Americans are sheep and will suffer the consequences. Too bad. But kinda funny at the same time.
Be prepared for more OWS crap in the near future, and don’t forget the popcorn (one of the rare vestige of American gastronomy that has survived decades of global imperialism and ethnomasochism).

Corporations should have a bigger voice in the White House

If you are trying to win an argument over politics in the United States, there are some advanced cheats you can easily use to discredit your opponent, such as calling him a fascist, a racist, a nationalist… or a pro-corporation. These cheats are so powerful that you can win any argument simply by using them, even against someone much more competent than you on political or economical subjects.

You see, in the middle of an unprecedented economic crisis, the massive trade deficit and public debt we face, and the continuously growing influence of the foreign and foreign interests in our own country, Americans are worried about corporations.
And by corporations, Americans don’t mean corporate lobbies, they just mean American corporations. Once again, demagogy became a convenient excuse for anti-Americanism.

That just proves to show that once more Americans are blaming scapegoats, and not any scapegoat because they are actually blaming the wealth creators and the only ones that draw money into the United States, as opposed to the very common American Business Model.

Many “Americans”, loyal adepts following the sheep mentality, have expressed their desire for corporations to have less voice in the White House. They even came up with a slogan, “Corporations are not people”. Some would argue that by doing that they are shooting themselves in the foot, since most of them are also supporters of famous anti-American lobbies, such as ecology, anti-racism or even globalism. Others would also argue that the priority would be to lessen the voice of the foreign out of our politics.

Some real questions arise from these clear demonstrations of demagogy and sheep mentality, including the following, should the corporations have a bigger or small voice inside the White House ?

First of all, supposing that we should lessen the voice of corporations/companies means that they already have some, which is clearly not the case. Have you ever heard of an act favoring American companies ? Sure the international socialist media might talk to you about SOPA/PIPA, but was it really a corporate issue ? Similar laws are effective in many other countries in the world (only more nationalist version), and have proven that such laws are more of a political issue.
Furthermore SOPA/PIPA don’t really favor American corporations since most musical labels and films distributors are foreign, and these laws don’t make distinction between the origin of any intellectual propriety (unlike their European equivalents for example).

Secondly, when is the last time Obama’s administration addressed an issue that American companies/entrepreneurs have to face ? Like social dumping, foreign protectionism, foreign nationalism, foreign economical imperialism, American ethnomasochism ? Even more consternating, when was the last time any president or political candidate had an open discussion with entrepreneurs, companies or any other wealth creator ? Despite them being very good at showing appalling doses of demagogy on public media, those facts alone exhibit their clear aversion for those that are actually bringing money in the USA.

Lastly, the anti-American media is very good at pointing out the supposed size of the corporations in our politics, but they forget that the entire American system is based on feeding off of these big corporations. The middle-class doesn’t export, neither do they bring money in the USA. The companies are the most taxed entities in this country, depriving them from political power would be not only stupid but also very hypocritical. The recent American government decisions were never pro-business, and much less pro-American business.

I honestly believe that more corporation voicing their views in the political debate can only be more beneficial.

Not only is it only fare that the biggest contributors to our economy have a bigger voice, but especially since they are close to being the only ones that actually know shit about the business world and political economy.

If I wanted to see unbiased global political economics brought to the political table and had a choice between :

  • Delusional politicians living in their fantasies incapable of seeing the facts of the market.
  • Unemployed hippies calling themselves the 99% and whining about the economic crisis.
  • Foreign news reporters writing about how globalism is good and how nationalism is bad, yet promoting the opposite in their respective countries.

…and actual companies that actually have real experience of how global economics work, I’d much rather have them inside a political debate.

In their political decisions American have for too long relied on principles, dreams, opinions, morals, ideas rather than on facts and on what actually works.

Ultimately, this is why the politicians that make the least amount of promises are always sanctioned. That tells you a lot about the voters, who at each election, will look for the person that says the most… without realizing that if he says so much, it’s because he doesn’t know shit.

Opinions and principles of our politicians are worthless, it’s time American stop the demagogy perpetuated by the media about what’s right to do, what’s ethical, what’s tolerant… and start looking at what works.

American multinational corporations, unlike most Americans, actually know what works and they also know what’s going on outside our borders. They actually know what discriminative laws they have to face when trying to implant themselves in this or that country, and also know that their foreign competitors don’t have to face these laws when implanting themselves in the USA.

I’d rather have them bring that to the political table then hear Santorum whining about Jesus or Ron Paul about torture.

The only way of seeing what works is to have actual global business experience. And actual global business experience comes from… reality, once again.

Not from Joe K. plumber since 1978 who thinks nationalism is bad because it’s “racist” and “intolerant”, not from Frank B. unemployed since always who thinks welfare is good because Obama said so, and certainly not from Jennifer A. writer for the Huffington Post who shares her political analysis every week yet learned about economy reading fucking cosmo.

The 2012 Demagogic elections

About every four years a very particular and intriguing event is held somewhere in the United States of America Demagogy, and many signs show that this year’s event will be at least as lame as every other year.

Similarly to how other countries elect representatives to govern them and act in their best interest, we in the United States of America Demagogy elect notorious globalists and demagogues to govern us, and act against our national interest.

You would be thinking that with the economic crisis that touches our country more then any other, with nationalist movements rising more than ever in Europe and every other country, with the disastrous results of half a decade of ethnomasochism and globalism, Americans would start to wake up and demand that their government start working in the national interest.

But apparently Americans are more concerned with gay rights, birth control pills and the legalization of marijuana.

These same Americans don’t seem to notice that they will soon experience a very painful blowback to use Ron Paul’s favorite term, once the Fed stops printing money. The errors of half a decade of ethnomasochistic governing and foreignism won’t be repaired with yet another bailout, and the consequences that Americans are starting to see are only the tip of the iceberg.

It was pretty funny last year to watch the Occupy Wall Street movement, yet another blatant excuse for anti-Americanism promoted by our ethnomasochistic media, because of the wide ignorance of the protesters.

Not only were they proposing even more international socialism to resolve problems created by international socialism, but really if they think our economic situation now is difficult, wait and see how it will be when the Europeans or the Russian take us over.

And no, there won’t be a massive bailout to magically solve our decades of trade-deficit, debt accumulation and other consequences to our anti-American globalist actions.

Even Ron Paul’s policies to cut government spending are widely insufficient at best, on the wrong track at worst.
As much as we need government spending’s limited, that alone won’t solve most of our problems. Germany, China, India, Denmark, France, Sweden Russia and most of the globe all have economies that are a lot more government depended than us (59% of GDP for Denmark, 56% for France) and their economy is in better shape than ours.

In 2008, we had to choose between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea, but trust me in 2012 we will have both.

As long as American interests aren’t the top and only priority of the voters, you might as well keep Obama and his current administration because no candidate is projecting much change in our ideology.

And apparently, seeing the possible candidates for the 2012 elections, the public opinion hasn’t evolved one bit despite the economic crisis of 2012.

As for me, once again I will not vote for anyone.

I was considered voting Ron Paul earlier this year but seriously it’s not even worth the effort, and I wouldn’t want to encourage the globalist system with my vote.

As long as we won’t have American elections, based on American interests and not demagogy, voting will be as useless here as in central Africa.

Taxonomy of the anti-Americans and other ethnomasochists

As you all know unless you are either totally new or totally oblivious to American politics, we are governed by the anti-Americans.
Whether they take the aspect of the change obsessed pathological liar (Barack Obama), the idealist civil war veteran (Ron Paul), the openly indoctrinated foreign loving trying-to-sound-ecological lobbyists (Green Party), the frustrated virgin racial internationalists (American Nazi Party, Ku Klux Klan), the constructivist religious fanatics (Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich) or even the openly international anti-American socialists, they all have one point in common : they hate American sovereignty.

They are always trying to ally their respective community/views/lobbies to fit the international and anti-American doctrine, in an attempt to weaken even more our nation.

And there are also the less visible governors, those that pledge allegiance to Europe and global imperialism, those that secretly support directly from the congress every lobby possible that favors Europe and the Foreign over the American interests, while claiming it’s in the interest of our nation.

But those are the cases of a very reserved part of the American population. Not everyone can improvise themselves governors of our nation without a certain social status, acquired by feeding even more of American sovereignty to the global imperialism and their private, or not so private, interests.
The following categories are, as we shall see, much less reserved and almost anyone can join them, provided they rid themselves of any form or ability of reflection, or at least steer it down the path of least resistance. A wide and comfortable furrow marked and trailed by decades of disinformation and ethnomasochism.

Different species of anti-Americans

Far ahead of any other species by its numerous quantity and low intellectual quotient is the hippie.
The hippie is what modern (and anti-American) media may refer to as a “liberal”. Resulting from the social-globalist culture, therefore being deprived on any depth of thought, the hippie is against war because it’s bad, and supports peace because it’s good.

He enjoys anything that is foreign because seen as “exotic”, he appreciates foreign films because he believes bad acting and poor screenplay are better forms of self-expression than constructed and methodical cinematic approaches that actually require some effort.
He is against Americanization of society, the 1%, the banks, the rednecks, the government, Wall Street and Fox News because NBC told him that it would get him pussy (and also because he doesn’t want to be labelled as “racist”).
He is open to any form of governmental regulation, socialism, Marxism, communism and even fascism (without him knowing the proper meaning of the term of course) as long as it doesn’t involve anything patriotic, because patriotism is bad and it leads to far-right ideologies like Hitler, Mussolini, Staline and Obama.
Alternatively, he can also be pro-liberty, pro-choice and anti-regulation depending on which politician got to influence him first.

Assuming the crappy mindset of “another world is possible” and that Foreign interests are more important than American interests because he is against racial and national discrimination. He is for the love of all mankind, and will often employ terms such as “citizens of the world”, “the human race”, “global interest”… Despite visiting foreign countries for tourism (ethnomasochism once more), he usually can’t even speak half a language and has no clue how economical or social interactions work, and is comforted in his fictional ideals by the lies and propaganda of the feel-good anti-American media. Generally, with these people the discussion is impossible as they often lack the basics understandings, the intelligence, the maturity or even the perspective to comprehend or even try to acknowledge the issues.

The second class of anti-American population that we would examine is the indoctrinator. Having secured a minor degree in political science, or simply just befriending the HR director of a local broadcast channel, the indoctrinator is widely located within media diffusion center, whether newspapers, television or radio.
His beliefs are similar to those of the hippie, only he is characterized by even more confidence in his doctrine because of his empowerment. Valiantly defending free-speech, he would likely censor anything that doesn’t fit exactly the anti-American globalist propaganda.
According to him, the United States caused World Wars I, II and III, global warming, hunger, Katrina, Fukushima, 9/11, the bubonic pest, necrophilia and child prostitution. If you don’t agree with that, you are a racist, fascist, intolerant child abuser and holocaust denier. You have been warned.

Thirdly, there is the wannabe-dissident. A very intriguing class of ethnomasochists popularized by no other than Ron Paul himself, the wannabe-dissent believes that he is challenging the system, or the establishment, while proposing the exact same reforms as the ones already applied for the last fifty years.
For this particular class of anti-Americans, I will go so far as to quote Einstein “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” and inviting you to read my article They all want change, which is partially about the wannabe-dissidents.

And lastly, a very common case of anti-Americanism, the extremist fanatic. Whether about gay rights, feminism, white pride, Islam, Christianity or environment, there are always the extremist fanatics believing that there is a greater good above the national interest, and willing to sacrifice our sovereignty for it.

To all these cases also adds the one of those who act purely in their own interests : Whether they are adepts of the American Business Model (serial importers of foreign products or culture), parasite free-trader, infiltrated foreigners or traitors to their nation : they are the are in the group that’s directly benefiting from the growing ethnomasochism and anti-Americanism in our own country.
They know exactly how the anti-American machine works, and how to feed it properly to ensure their economic prosperity (and our economic decline). It’s not that hard if you read this article by the way.

Dichotomy of the anti-Americanism

This taxonomy list is far from being complete, but it gives a general idea of who the ethnomasochists are. It has another utility for the patriot, which is to definite two main constants in anti-Americanism.
Those who promote anti-Americanism, ethnomasochism or any other derived form that profits the foreign interest are either hypocritical or cynical.

The hypocrites will used terms as “global interests” and “citizens of the world” to convince Americans to adopt ethnomasochism. They are comparable to Jehovah witnesses, and strive to the destruction of American sovereignty.
The cynics on the other hand, acknowledge that they are working against our interest but also know that if they don’t do it, someone else will… and someone else will profit from it.

Americanization of society

Americanization

Probably the biggest myth of all time, perpetuated both by the local anti-American media and the foreign anti-American media.

According to this unfounded myth, there would be a colonial-like expansion of American culture over the world, destroying the local cultures (the good guys) and profiting to the bad American New World Order conspirators (the bad guys).

And they really think we are that stupid ? They really want us to believe that ?

We are the only country in the world where having a foreign accent is a sign of status and not social retardation.
We are the only country in the world where concepts such as foreign films can impose themselves.
We are the only country in the world where cultural and economical imperialism is frown upon and not revered.
We are the only country in the world where nationalism and patriotism are stigmatized, we are even the only country in the world where nationalism isn’t represented by any political organization.
We are the only country in the world where the government and the media propaganda work not for the country, but against the country.
We are the only country in the world where local culture is forsaken to the profit of foreign culture.
We are the only country in the world where national interest is neglected to the profit of global imperialism and European hegemony.

… and they want us to believe in “Americanization” of society ?

There is a Francization of society, a Germanization of society, a Japanization… but I have yet to seen an Americanization of society.
And if there really is a cultural “globalization”, it is definitively not American.

How could there be an “Americanization” when we have the biggest trade deficit in the world ?
How could there be an “Americanization” when American culture is being repudiated in our own country ?

The anti-Americans are constantly searching for ways to destroy our sovereignty, whether economically or culturally, and these phenomenons are amplifying and aggravating.
In no other country are ethnomasochism and the cult-like reverence to the foreign as strong and as accepted than in the United States of America.
We are assisting a real cultural colonization by the Europeans (but not only). They feed on our weaknesses, and notably the growing ethnomasochism which has no reason to be, especially in this country.

In less than 400 years, the United States of America have produced more cultural value than the rest of the world, except maybe the Asian cultures, in their whole existence.
Not only do the United States of America have a stronger cultural patrimony than any other country in the world, but our cultures are also the most diverse and varied.

Yet, due to the active colonization carried out by the global and anti-American imperialists, most Americans ignore it and turn themselves to foreign cultures, and all to the profit of the foreign of course. And in the process, destroying a little more what’s left of American culture and American sovereignty. Talk about a vicious cycle.
To defend ourselves against this destructive tendency, Americans must strive to admire and be proud of their civilization, thus rediscovering their roots.
The affirmation of American culture is the concern of all Americans, and not the political power alone, whose role will be limited to supporting all initiatives along these lines.

On a side-note, even if there was an “Americanization” of society, which is clearly not the case, why in the world would the Americans be ashamed of it ?
In every European political program there’s always a very ostentatious section about promoting the local cultures in the world, at the expense of other cultures. In other words, they are all encouraging THEIR cultural colonization, even at the expense of other cultures.

If there was an Americanization of society, Americans should be proud of it.
Rejecting our American imperialism and American hegemony, two fictitious concepts for the moment, is the first step to ethnomasochism.
And not rejecting foreign colonization, a very factual concept, is the first step towards global slavery.

The American Business Model

American Business ModelWant to know an easy way to destroy the healthiest and most powerful economy in the world and turn it into a mere import market highly dependent on governmental stimulus with the highest trade deficit in the world ? Easy, try the American Business Model.

While in the rest of the world, regular economies are based on a cooperative patriotic model that we will call “regular model” for short, we in America being very ethnomasochist have developed what is called the American Business Model.

The purpose of this American Business Model, advocated by multiple political personalities such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Ron Paul, is to screw Americans out of business, weaken our economic security, destroy our financial independence as well as our sovereignty, and all in the name of less profit.

Yes you heard me right, you will have LESS profit than if you followed the traditional cooperative patriotic model, the regular model if you will. The beauty of the American Business Model is that it’s so ahead of the curve that it will give you as least profit as possible while effectively ruining your country.
Of course, the American Business Model comes in pair with ethnomasochism, concept which has, I believe, vastly inspired it.

American Business Model vs Regular Model

For the rest of this article, we will use the examples of Walmart and its foreign competitors to illustrate the power, or lack of, the American Business Model over the regular model.
In the process of selling goods, for example in a retail store like Walmart, there are three factors to into account. These three factors represent each financial transfer, and are of course the production costs, the transfer costs and the purchasing costs.

The first one involves the costs of the production at the factory. It’s beneficial for the workers and their country, not so much for the factory that produces the goods.
The second involves the retail store buying from the factory. The cost is higher than the one of the production, so it’s beneficial for the factory, not so much for the retail store.
The third involves the customer buying from the retail store. The cost is higher than the one of the transfer, so it’s beneficial for the retail store, not so much for the customer.

All this to learn that the customer is losing money when he buys something, but the customer can become a worker himself. I added “and their country” on the first case, but virtually it’s beneficial for the country of anyone winning money so it also applies for the other two. Simultaneously, we could argue that it’s detrimental for the countries of the buyers who lose money on their purchases.

In the regular business model, let’s take the example of a retail store of a foreign country F. If the CEO of this store wants to make money by selling goods, he needs to have these goods produced first.
1. Usually he will address a local manufacturing company, in the same country F, and start selling to the local market. For the moment, there are only financial transfers inside the country F, F is neither benefiting neither losing from these transfers.
2. If he wants more money, he will try to export the goods to the rest of the world. This means more money for the retail store, and more money for the manufacturing company because they will have more commands. The country F is exponentially beneficial, because they “win” not only from the retail stores income but also from the factory’s labor.

Now let’s have a look at the American business model. The CEO of a retail store in the USA wants to make money by selling products.
1. Being a good ethnomasochist he will try to outsource to a manufacturing company in a foreign country and start selling on his local market, the US market. For the moment, there are only unilateral financial transfers from the USA to the foreign where the factory is located.
2. If he wants more money, he won’t try to export. He will try to find more foreign and “exotic” products to bring to the US market, even more losses for the USA. There being a constant stimulus of money from the Fed in many forms, there will always be enough money on the US territory, only its weakening even more our economy.

I took the example of Walmart because they serve as a good example, but there are even more extreme cases of the American Business Model.
But take Walmart and its competitor Carrefour, which is french. Walmart imports products from China and sells to exhaustion to the US market and a few other markets. Carrefour sells almost exclusively French made products around the world, even to China.

As long as American companies continue with this unsustainable business model,
As long as American companies search to bring foreign products into the US market instead of trying to export US products,
As long as American companies, in order to make more money, will try to make product cheaper instead of trying to export,
the United States will continue down the same road.

They all want change

2012 changeDespite the current economic recession in which we flounder cheerfully, most Americans are more concerned with seeing who will be next anti-American buffoon to “represent” them at the White House.
Despite the growing public debt, the massive trade deficit with every other country in the world, the ethnomasochism in our society and the idolatry of foreign cultures reaching never ending heights, the Americans really believe that a mere change in governance will solve their problems.

A bit more on the trade deficit. If you followed the news two weeks ago, you may have noticed that our trade deficit has nearly reached $600 billion with the world for 2011 alone, including a $300 billion trade deficit with China. An obvious result nevertheless.
Notice that in America we don’t even speak of “trade balance” anymore but simply “trade deficit”, unconsciously implying that our trade balance couldn’t be positive.

Now back to our politicians. Since Barack Obama’s 2008 election campaign, every since presidential candidate wants “change”. Granted that’s the basis of a candidacy, but this message has only been reinforced since Obama’s campaign.

Every single candidate from the Republicans to the Democrats have the same expectations : more jobs, more buying power, better lifestyles,etc…
But in reality, none is taking any action or even proposing any solution towards any “change”.

Basically, they are proposing the exact same politics as for the last forty years and expecting it to work out different for some random reason. What’s the old saying, “do what you as you always did and get what you always got” ?

What the politicians are actually meaning when are proposing the SAME INEFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS as for the last four decades, is that they don’t want real “change”, they just want the same consequences as for the last four decades.
And I quote : delocalizations, trade deficits, ethnomasochism, anti-Americanism, poor buying power.

I have a serious hard time believing how Ron Paul, or any other media-built “savior”, will change anything when he is proposing the same thing as for the last forty, or even fifty years.
As I said in my previous article, small government and debt reduction isn’t all. Fighting socialism isn’t everything there is.

Take countries like China, Japan, Germany, South Korea. They are a lot more government dependent than the USA, and have more jobs, more buying power (yes even China), less trade deficit, and obviously not the typical American (or anti-American ?) ethnomasochism.
They produce more, they export more (proportionally), live better, have a lot more buying power, and typically do the opposite of what Ron Paul advocates.
Even most European countries, which pay up to 300% more taxes than in America (multiple taxes on income, VAT…) and have the Euro burden produce more than us and bring in more income than us.

I’m not saying every proposition of Ron Paul or any other politician is bad, just that they are no solutions to the bigger problems, bigger problems that are intentionally evaded.

If Americans want real lasting “change” for the better, simply stop the idolatry of the Foreign : foreign cultures, foreign tourism and especially foreign products like foreign films.

Anti-Racism means anti-Americanism

Notice that for a foreigner to vilify, even in an untruthful way, any part of the American society is completely acceptable, even in the USA.
For a foreigner, or even an American, to despise the American culture or negatively stereotype is completely acceptable.

On the other hand, would an American only express his opinion about something foreign, provided his opinion is negative, and he instantly becomes a fascist, an intolerant, an ignorant, a nazi, a racist and a terrorist.

Examples : For a foreigner to invent and promote libelous lies concerning the American intervention in Afghanistan or Iraq, about McDonald’s, Monsanto or any other American company, is completely acceptable.
But would an American simply state that he dislikes k-pop or foreign films and that instantly becomes an evident sign of his intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racism.

And all this in the name of “anti-racism”, which translates in most cases as anti-Americanism.
In the anti-American media, racial or national discrimination only becomes so when perpetuated by an American against the foreign.

The Japanese pride themselves in Pearl Harbor attacks and that’s acceptable, but would an American support Hiroshima/Nagasaki and the American occupation of Japan and he would instantly become an intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racist.

The German pride themselves in the Wehrmacht and their war crimes and that’s acceptable, but would an American support the American intervention in WWII and he would instantly become an intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racist.

These are the basics of ethnomasochism and anti-Americanism, two principles promoted once again by our media.