Monthly Archives: February, 2012

Taxonomy of the anti-Americans and other ethnomasochists

As you all know unless you are either totally new or totally oblivious to American politics, we are governed by the anti-Americans.
Whether they take the aspect of the change obsessed pathological liar (Barack Obama), the idealist civil war veteran (Ron Paul), the openly indoctrinated foreign loving trying-to-sound-ecological lobbyists (Green Party), the frustrated virgin racial internationalists (American Nazi Party, Ku Klux Klan), the constructivist religious fanatics (Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich) or even the openly international anti-American socialists, they all have one point in common : they hate American sovereignty.

They are always trying to ally their respective community/views/lobbies to fit the international and anti-American doctrine, in an attempt to weaken even more our nation.

And there are also the less visible governors, those that pledge allegiance to Europe and global imperialism, those that secretly support directly from the congress every lobby possible that favors Europe and the Foreign over the American interests, while claiming it’s in the interest of our nation.

But those are the cases of a very reserved part of the American population. Not everyone can improvise themselves governors of our nation without a certain social status, acquired by feeding even more of American sovereignty to the global imperialism and their private, or not so private, interests.
The following categories are, as we shall see, much less reserved and almost anyone can join them, provided they rid themselves of any form or ability of reflection, or at least steer it down the path of least resistance. A wide and comfortable furrow marked and trailed by decades of disinformation and ethnomasochism.

Different species of anti-Americans

Far ahead of any other species by its numerous quantity and low intellectual quotient is the hippie.
The hippie is what modern (and anti-American) media may refer to as a “liberal”. Resulting from the social-globalist culture, therefore being deprived on any depth of thought, the hippie is against war because it’s bad, and supports peace because it’s good.

He enjoys anything that is foreign because seen as “exotic”, he appreciates foreign films because he believes bad acting and poor screenplay are better forms of self-expression than constructed and methodical cinematic approaches that actually require some effort.
He is against Americanization of society, the 1%, the banks, the rednecks, the government, Wall Street and Fox News because NBC told him that it would get him pussy (and also because he doesn’t want to be labelled as “racist”).
He is open to any form of governmental regulation, socialism, Marxism, communism and even fascism (without him knowing the proper meaning of the term of course) as long as it doesn’t involve anything patriotic, because patriotism is bad and it leads to far-right ideologies like Hitler, Mussolini, Staline and Obama.
Alternatively, he can also be pro-liberty, pro-choice and anti-regulation depending on which politician got to influence him first.

Assuming the crappy mindset of “another world is possible” and that Foreign interests are more important than American interests because he is against racial and national discrimination. He is for the love of all mankind, and will often employ terms such as “citizens of the world”, “the human race”, “global interest”… Despite visiting foreign countries for tourism (ethnomasochism once more), he usually can’t even speak half a language and has no clue how economical or social interactions work, and is comforted in his fictional ideals by the lies and propaganda of the feel-good anti-American media. Generally, with these people the discussion is impossible as they often lack the basics understandings, the intelligence, the maturity or even the perspective to comprehend or even try to acknowledge the issues.

The second class of anti-American population that we would examine is the indoctrinator. Having secured a minor degree in political science, or simply just befriending the HR director of a local broadcast channel, the indoctrinator is widely located within media diffusion center, whether newspapers, television or radio.
His beliefs are similar to those of the hippie, only he is characterized by even more confidence in his doctrine because of his empowerment. Valiantly defending free-speech, he would likely censor anything that doesn’t fit exactly the anti-American globalist propaganda.
According to him, the United States caused World Wars I, II and III, global warming, hunger, Katrina, Fukushima, 9/11, the bubonic pest, necrophilia and child prostitution. If you don’t agree with that, you are a racist, fascist, intolerant child abuser and holocaust denier. You have been warned.

Thirdly, there is the wannabe-dissident. A very intriguing class of ethnomasochists popularized by no other than Ron Paul himself, the wannabe-dissent believes that he is challenging the system, or the establishment, while proposing the exact same reforms as the ones already applied for the last fifty years.
For this particular class of anti-Americans, I will go so far as to quote Einstein “Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results” and inviting you to read my article They all want change, which is partially about the wannabe-dissidents.

And lastly, a very common case of anti-Americanism, the extremist fanatic. Whether about gay rights, feminism, white pride, Islam, Christianity or environment, there are always the extremist fanatics believing that there is a greater good above the national interest, and willing to sacrifice our sovereignty for it.

To all these cases also adds the one of those who act purely in their own interests : Whether they are adepts of the American Business Model (serial importers of foreign products or culture), parasite free-trader, infiltrated foreigners or traitors to their nation : they are the are in the group that’s directly benefiting from the growing ethnomasochism and anti-Americanism in our own country.
They know exactly how the anti-American machine works, and how to feed it properly to ensure their economic prosperity (and our economic decline). It’s not that hard if you read this article by the way.

Dichotomy of the anti-Americanism

This taxonomy list is far from being complete, but it gives a general idea of who the ethnomasochists are. It has another utility for the patriot, which is to definite two main constants in anti-Americanism.
Those who promote anti-Americanism, ethnomasochism or any other derived form that profits the foreign interest are either hypocritical or cynical.

The hypocrites will used terms as “global interests” and “citizens of the world” to convince Americans to adopt ethnomasochism. They are comparable to Jehovah witnesses, and strive to the destruction of American sovereignty.
The cynics on the other hand, acknowledge that they are working against our interest but also know that if they don’t do it, someone else will… and someone else will profit from it.

Mitt Romney’s wife drives several Cadillacs

Following the perpetual ethnomasochism in our media, we now have instituted a new doctrine pairing with that : the cult of mediocrity.

It’s clear now, for those who still had any doubts, that the anti-American media’s only goal is to lead us straight to a soviet-like system, only very ethnomasochistic. In other words, they want Nationalsozialismus… without the National of course.

I don’t personally like Mitt Romney as a politician, and I certainly wouldn’t want him in the White House, but you have to respect what he has done for this country.
As CEO of Bain & Company he was credited for leading the firm out of crisis, and founded one of the biggest private equity investments companies in the world.
And not only did he enrich himself by bringing money into the United States, as opposed to the supporters of the American Business Model that do the exact opposite (Walmart anyone ?), he also chose to spend his money in a patriotic way, by buying not one but several American cars.

How dare he be rich ? That privilege should be reserved to the Foreign ! No American should be allowed to be wealthy, as that would mean less money for the Foreign invaders !
And not only did he acquire his wealth in a healthy way for our nation, as opposed to say public-spending profit-suckers, but now he also decides to spend it in a patriotic way ?

Such acts of blatant intolerance could only come from a nationalist, fascist, racist pornographer, intolerant child-rapist and maybe even a little antisemitic. Those acts go against everything propagandized by the media : worshiping the foreign.
That’s not demagogic / anti-American at all !
Buying American products ? What’s next, racial segregation ? Concentration camps ? He must be stopped at all costs !

He should of gave away all his money to the foreign the very second he earned it ! Or at least, he should of spent it promoting foreign films in our own nation !
How can a man aspire to be the next president of the United States, when he is not even capable of kneeling before the foreign colonization of our society !

He should of been proud to give his American money away to foreigners that despise Americans, and will probably never pay any taxes in this country.
He should of been proud to feed what’s left of American sovereignty to the European hegemony.

Did he even think of the consequences of his acts ? He could of helped an American company be more competitive and have more funds to spend on research, or even worse create more jobs in America !

No wonder the media is trying so hard to bring him down after that.

It’s stunning that the media would have more respect for a teacher (sucking public funds) that decides to buy Toyota or Volkswagen cars and then comes complaining about the “1%”, portraying him as the poor victim of modern society (bad banksters, bad government, bad America…), and exhibit successful and patriotic people such as Romney as the enemy.

Because in reality, we’d much rather send our precious and costly dollars to Martin in Germany or Carlos in France, which are very happy to receive them, rather than producing our own products and supporting our own economy, and maybe even sell our products to other countries that could give us their dollars for once.

What a pleasure it is for all Americans to participate in the wealth of countries that openly consider themselves our enemies, countries that apparently need our money more then we do despite the economical crisis we are floundering in.

What a pleasure it is for all Americans to enrich even more some already rich capitalists from all around the world that will never pay the slightest tax in America, and that probably vote for nationalist and anti-American political parties in their respective countries.

What a pleasure it is, finally, for all Americans to know that countries that openly promote anti-Americanism in all its forms will retrieve an increasing share of our wealth.

It’s so much better to “work” a 9-5 job sucking money out of the commonwealth, forcing our government to borrow or print our salaries directly from the Fed, then give it all away to our enemies while complaining that the government is screwing us up.

Americans already had a serious problem with ethnomasochism, but if we add to that the growing cult of mediocrity, I can clearly state it : we are fucked.

Americanization of society

Americanization

Probably the biggest myth of all time, perpetuated both by the local anti-American media and the foreign anti-American media.

According to this unfounded myth, there would be a colonial-like expansion of American culture over the world, destroying the local cultures (the good guys) and profiting to the bad American New World Order conspirators (the bad guys).

And they really think we are that stupid ? They really want us to believe that ?

We are the only country in the world where having a foreign accent is a sign of status and not social retardation.
We are the only country in the world where concepts such as foreign films can impose themselves.
We are the only country in the world where cultural and economical imperialism is frown upon and not revered.
We are the only country in the world where nationalism and patriotism are stigmatized, we are even the only country in the world where nationalism isn’t represented by any political organization.
We are the only country in the world where the government and the media propaganda work not for the country, but against the country.
We are the only country in the world where local culture is forsaken to the profit of foreign culture.
We are the only country in the world where national interest is neglected to the profit of global imperialism and European hegemony.

… and they want us to believe in “Americanization” of society ?

There is a Francization of society, a Germanization of society, a Japanization… but I have yet to seen an Americanization of society.
And if there really is a cultural “globalization”, it is definitively not American.

How could there be an “Americanization” when we have the biggest trade deficit in the world ?
How could there be an “Americanization” when American culture is being repudiated in our own country ?

The anti-Americans are constantly searching for ways to destroy our sovereignty, whether economically or culturally, and these phenomenons are amplifying and aggravating.
In no other country are ethnomasochism and the cult-like reverence to the foreign as strong and as accepted than in the United States of America.
We are assisting a real cultural colonization by the Europeans (but not only). They feed on our weaknesses, and notably the growing ethnomasochism which has no reason to be, especially in this country.

In less than 400 years, the United States of America have produced more cultural value than the rest of the world, except maybe the Asian cultures, in their whole existence.
Not only do the United States of America have a stronger cultural patrimony than any other country in the world, but our cultures are also the most diverse and varied.

Yet, due to the active colonization carried out by the global and anti-American imperialists, most Americans ignore it and turn themselves to foreign cultures, and all to the profit of the foreign of course. And in the process, destroying a little more what’s left of American culture and American sovereignty. Talk about a vicious cycle.
To defend ourselves against this destructive tendency, Americans must strive to admire and be proud of their civilization, thus rediscovering their roots.
The affirmation of American culture is the concern of all Americans, and not the political power alone, whose role will be limited to supporting all initiatives along these lines.

On a side-note, even if there was an “Americanization” of society, which is clearly not the case, why in the world would the Americans be ashamed of it ?
In every European political program there’s always a very ostentatious section about promoting the local cultures in the world, at the expense of other cultures. In other words, they are all encouraging THEIR cultural colonization, even at the expense of other cultures.

If there was an Americanization of society, Americans should be proud of it.
Rejecting our American imperialism and American hegemony, two fictitious concepts for the moment, is the first step to ethnomasochism.
And not rejecting foreign colonization, a very factual concept, is the first step towards global slavery.

Why the blowback is a joke

The “blowback” is the new fancy term coined by no other than Ron Paul to describe, rationalize or even justify blatant anti-Americanism from other countries. Once again, coming from Ron Paul, this concept is very idealistic, biased and with no anchor whatsoever in reality.

According to Ron Paul, if there is anti-Americanism in the world, it’s because America assaulted the “world” first and they are just defending themselves. It’s a very simplistic way of define these issues, and I’m sure that it fits perfectly the ethnomasochist mindset of most of our media.

To explain this concept he takes the examples of war in the middle-east. Not only does he blames our “preemptive” wars for the terrorist acts against America, but he even justifies them.
Obviously this is completely wrong, and the main reason of anti-Americanism in the world is that Americans adopted ethnomasochist views and rejected nationalism.

The same goes for immigration. In countries with strong national identity, the immigrants do everything they can to fit in, communitarianism only builds in ethnomasochist countries.

To get back to Ron Paul’s example of “blowback”, if what he was saying was true, how come the United States are the only ones touched by this “blowback” ?
Compared to some European countries, our intervention in the middle-east was fairly clean : no assaults on civilians, no lootings… Why is there no blowback for the Europeans ?

Does Ron Paul know anything about Al Qaeda ? They are said to target countries that oppose the charia laws.
But if that was really the case, why didn’t they target European countries who are much more islamophobic that the USA ? In the USA there is religious freedom, even the extremist Muslims can build mosques, wear religion symbols, not be discriminated by the judicial system due to their ethnics, and even burn American flags without being persecuted.

Moreover, the Wehrmacht and the Red Army have done much worse than the USA in eastern Europe, so why wasn’t there any blowback for them ?

The blowback is a joke and so is Ron Paul.

European medias that support Ron Paul

Many of you already know, as I explained it in my article Ron Paul is the most hypocritical candidate, that Ron Paul had seen his popularity grow significantly since the last few years, not only in “American” media and European media. If I predicted the first case, see They all want change, the latter is for the least astonishing, especially for someone seen by our “American” media as the savior of our nation.

Maybe it’s Ron Paul’s opposition to any form of American patriotism that appeals the foreign so much ? Or maybe they like his ideas on free trade and small government ?
But if they support anti-patriotism in America, free trade in America and small governments in America, wouldn’t that mean that they also support those ideas in their own countries ?
Wrong.

Most of the medias supporting Ron Paul now are also the ones supporting the European nationalists groups, and honestly I don’t see any similitude in their programs.
Ron Paul and the European nationalist parties are both labelled as anti-system, or anti-establishment. In both cases, this is an incorrect label as neither Ron Paul nor the European nationalist parties are actually proposing anything fundamentally different than what’s in effect in their respective countries.

So now let’s review Ron Paul message :

  • Strong emphasis on morals and principles : ethics above patriotism
  • For free trade and against any border restrictions
  • Supporting globalism against nationalism
  • A very limited government
  • For government transparency
  • Against cultural ethnocentrism

And now let’s review the commonalities of many European nationalist programs :

  • Strong emphasis on patriotism and ethnocentrism : patriotism above ethics
  • For important border restrictions and against free trade
  • Supporting nationalism against globalism
  • A strong state/government
  • Zero government transparency : control of the medias, control of mails/phone calls of citizens and applying even more the “reasons of state” (basically meaning that governments can’t be condemn for any crime/violation because they are acting in the best interests of the citizens)
  • For cultural ethnocentrism, and even the prohibition of American culture

It’s obvious that not only are there very few similarities (if any) between Ron Paul’s program and the European nationalist ideas, but they are actually opposite.
The only subject that they agree on is that they are both justifying and supporting anti-Americanism and anti-American terrorism.

This information is all verifiable, I can even provide you every political program of each party for the most recent years and you can compare for yourselves (if you read the languages).

Moreover, next time you see any foreign or “American” media supporting Ron Paul’s ideas, know that they are also supporting the opposite for their country. They just agree with anti-Americanism.
The same goes for any opposition to American governments.

The American Business Model

American Business ModelWant to know an easy way to destroy the healthiest and most powerful economy in the world and turn it into a mere import market highly dependent on governmental stimulus with the highest trade deficit in the world ? Easy, try the American Business Model.

While in the rest of the world, regular economies are based on a cooperative patriotic model that we will call “regular model” for short, we in America being very ethnomasochist have developed what is called the American Business Model.

The purpose of this American Business Model, advocated by multiple political personalities such as George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Ron Paul, is to screw Americans out of business, weaken our economic security, destroy our financial independence as well as our sovereignty, and all in the name of less profit.

Yes you heard me right, you will have LESS profit than if you followed the traditional cooperative patriotic model, the regular model if you will. The beauty of the American Business Model is that it’s so ahead of the curve that it will give you as least profit as possible while effectively ruining your country.
Of course, the American Business Model comes in pair with ethnomasochism, concept which has, I believe, vastly inspired it.

American Business Model vs Regular Model

For the rest of this article, we will use the examples of Walmart and its foreign competitors to illustrate the power, or lack of, the American Business Model over the regular model.
In the process of selling goods, for example in a retail store like Walmart, there are three factors to into account. These three factors represent each financial transfer, and are of course the production costs, the transfer costs and the purchasing costs.

The first one involves the costs of the production at the factory. It’s beneficial for the workers and their country, not so much for the factory that produces the goods.
The second involves the retail store buying from the factory. The cost is higher than the one of the production, so it’s beneficial for the factory, not so much for the retail store.
The third involves the customer buying from the retail store. The cost is higher than the one of the transfer, so it’s beneficial for the retail store, not so much for the customer.

All this to learn that the customer is losing money when he buys something, but the customer can become a worker himself. I added “and their country” on the first case, but virtually it’s beneficial for the country of anyone winning money so it also applies for the other two. Simultaneously, we could argue that it’s detrimental for the countries of the buyers who lose money on their purchases.

In the regular business model, let’s take the example of a retail store of a foreign country F. If the CEO of this store wants to make money by selling goods, he needs to have these goods produced first.
1. Usually he will address a local manufacturing company, in the same country F, and start selling to the local market. For the moment, there are only financial transfers inside the country F, F is neither benefiting neither losing from these transfers.
2. If he wants more money, he will try to export the goods to the rest of the world. This means more money for the retail store, and more money for the manufacturing company because they will have more commands. The country F is exponentially beneficial, because they “win” not only from the retail stores income but also from the factory’s labor.

Now let’s have a look at the American business model. The CEO of a retail store in the USA wants to make money by selling products.
1. Being a good ethnomasochist he will try to outsource to a manufacturing company in a foreign country and start selling on his local market, the US market. For the moment, there are only unilateral financial transfers from the USA to the foreign where the factory is located.
2. If he wants more money, he won’t try to export. He will try to find more foreign and “exotic” products to bring to the US market, even more losses for the USA. There being a constant stimulus of money from the Fed in many forms, there will always be enough money on the US territory, only its weakening even more our economy.

I took the example of Walmart because they serve as a good example, but there are even more extreme cases of the American Business Model.
But take Walmart and its competitor Carrefour, which is french. Walmart imports products from China and sells to exhaustion to the US market and a few other markets. Carrefour sells almost exclusively French made products around the world, even to China.

As long as American companies continue with this unsustainable business model,
As long as American companies search to bring foreign products into the US market instead of trying to export US products,
As long as American companies, in order to make more money, will try to make product cheaper instead of trying to export,
the United States will continue down the same road.

They all want change

2012 changeDespite the current economic recession in which we flounder cheerfully, most Americans are more concerned with seeing who will be next anti-American buffoon to “represent” them at the White House.
Despite the growing public debt, the massive trade deficit with every other country in the world, the ethnomasochism in our society and the idolatry of foreign cultures reaching never ending heights, the Americans really believe that a mere change in governance will solve their problems.

A bit more on the trade deficit. If you followed the news two weeks ago, you may have noticed that our trade deficit has nearly reached $600 billion with the world for 2011 alone, including a $300 billion trade deficit with China. An obvious result nevertheless.
Notice that in America we don’t even speak of “trade balance” anymore but simply “trade deficit”, unconsciously implying that our trade balance couldn’t be positive.

Now back to our politicians. Since Barack Obama’s 2008 election campaign, every since presidential candidate wants “change”. Granted that’s the basis of a candidacy, but this message has only been reinforced since Obama’s campaign.

Every single candidate from the Republicans to the Democrats have the same expectations : more jobs, more buying power, better lifestyles,etc…
But in reality, none is taking any action or even proposing any solution towards any “change”.

Basically, they are proposing the exact same politics as for the last forty years and expecting it to work out different for some random reason. What’s the old saying, “do what you as you always did and get what you always got” ?

What the politicians are actually meaning when are proposing the SAME INEFFECTIVE SOLUTIONS as for the last four decades, is that they don’t want real “change”, they just want the same consequences as for the last four decades.
And I quote : delocalizations, trade deficits, ethnomasochism, anti-Americanism, poor buying power.

I have a serious hard time believing how Ron Paul, or any other media-built “savior”, will change anything when he is proposing the same thing as for the last forty, or even fifty years.
As I said in my previous article, small government and debt reduction isn’t all. Fighting socialism isn’t everything there is.

Take countries like China, Japan, Germany, South Korea. They are a lot more government dependent than the USA, and have more jobs, more buying power (yes even China), less trade deficit, and obviously not the typical American (or anti-American ?) ethnomasochism.
They produce more, they export more (proportionally), live better, have a lot more buying power, and typically do the opposite of what Ron Paul advocates.
Even most European countries, which pay up to 300% more taxes than in America (multiple taxes on income, VAT…) and have the Euro burden produce more than us and bring in more income than us.

I’m not saying every proposition of Ron Paul or any other politician is bad, just that they are no solutions to the bigger problems, bigger problems that are intentionally evaded.

If Americans want real lasting “change” for the better, simply stop the idolatry of the Foreign : foreign cultures, foreign tourism and especially foreign products like foreign films.

Small government and debt reduction isn’t all

Public Debt in USAIn some of my more recent posts, including Ron Paul the most hypocritical candidate, I strongly criticized Ron Paul for being yet another “miracle elixir” charlatan when addressing to the masses. I also criticized him for finding easy scapegoats to blame and for distorting the liberal/libertarian message.

At the beginning of the 2008 economic crisis, precisely during the Paulson Plan, the bailout stimulus and at the peak of the socialist “Yes we can” campaigns, I correctly predicted that the public opinion would change from socialism to “liberalism”.

I will go deeper into this in subsequent articles, but the point is that the change of political direction of the masses was fairly predictable. But if on the surface the political opinions have changed, it’s really both sides of the same coin.
Socialism was simply running out of “miracle pills” for all society issues, so logically “liberalism” took over.
When I say “liberalism”, I am referring to Ron Paul’s propaganda, sort of based on liberalism… on the surface.

The problems in the United States are not so much political than ideological. Going from international socialism to international “ronpaulism” (sorry I really can’t associate liberalism or libertarianism to his policies) is not really what we need.
Sure it’s better to have an ethnomasochist government that’s not in debt and doesn’t fuck with our currency rather than an ethnomasochist government that does, but the core problems are still here.

The masses went from international socialism to international ronpaulism, thinking of it as a major change in our politics.
They went from :

  • cheering “Yes we can” to cheering “End the Fed”
  • seeing the “rich” as the cause of all our problems to seeing the “government” as the cause of all our problems (scapegoating)
  • defending foreign interests by bailouts and international aids to defending the foreign by non-interventionism
  • etc…

Notice that every scapegoat found for our problems has to be American (corporates, governments, the American rich class), otherwise you are labelled as racist.
Even the 9/11 attacks are blamed by the Americans on other Americans, since they are so scared of conflicting the foreign.

And if in appearance Ron Paul’s message seems liberal, it’s not.
I can’t stress this enough but liberalism means individual responsibility.
Is finding scapegoats a responsible attitude ? Blaming the government for everything (I never thought I would defend the government some day) ?

Ron Paul simply chose a few parts of liberalism that seemed appealing to the masses, such as the opposition to statism (that Ron Paul incorrectly distorts into the opposition of our government), debt reduction (which should be mandatory for every politician by now), low taxes and non-interventionism.
He added a good dose of ethnomasochism and foreign loving propaganda for it to be even more demagogic, and based his whole political program on those ideas.

But as stated in the title, those ideas aren’t everything. Neither the government nor the debt caused our huge trade deficit (granted that governmental intervention might contribute to extend it), neither the government nor the debt caused massive delocalizations, unemployment and foreign outsourcing, neither the government nor the debt caused ethnomasochism and the cult of the foreign.

Ron Paul is just another miracle pills selling hippie, just as Obama, Bush and all the internationalists that value foreign interests above American interests. He simply chose to changed his message to fit the “new-age” public opinion.

What the United States of America need is a serious nationalist candidate, with serious liberal propositions. We don’t have fifty solutions anyway.
A balanced budget is a requirement, but it’s definitively not a solution. Don’t confuse means and ens.

Anti-Racism means anti-Americanism

Notice that for a foreigner to vilify, even in an untruthful way, any part of the American society is completely acceptable, even in the USA.
For a foreigner, or even an American, to despise the American culture or negatively stereotype is completely acceptable.

On the other hand, would an American only express his opinion about something foreign, provided his opinion is negative, and he instantly becomes a fascist, an intolerant, an ignorant, a nazi, a racist and a terrorist.

Examples : For a foreigner to invent and promote libelous lies concerning the American intervention in Afghanistan or Iraq, about McDonald’s, Monsanto or any other American company, is completely acceptable.
But would an American simply state that he dislikes k-pop or foreign films and that instantly becomes an evident sign of his intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racism.

And all this in the name of “anti-racism”, which translates in most cases as anti-Americanism.
In the anti-American media, racial or national discrimination only becomes so when perpetuated by an American against the foreign.

The Japanese pride themselves in Pearl Harbor attacks and that’s acceptable, but would an American support Hiroshima/Nagasaki and the American occupation of Japan and he would instantly become an intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racist.

The German pride themselves in the Wehrmacht and their war crimes and that’s acceptable, but would an American support the American intervention in WWII and he would instantly become an intolerant-and-ignorant-omg-racist.

These are the basics of ethnomasochism and anti-Americanism, two principles promoted once again by our media.